tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3658799842683274996.post1181679727732800050..comments2023-10-25T07:52:59.108-07:00Comments on Bad Company: The Unbearable Lightness of Michael HarrisPatrick Rosshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12268876306800933642noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3658799842683274996.post-60100311476462131392014-10-20T12:18:51.607-07:002014-10-20T12:18:51.607-07:00I withdraw part of my previous post. You misrepres...I withdraw part of my previous post. You misrepresent what Michael Harris said about the SCC's decision on Marc Nadon. The court found that Nadon’s appointment was "unconstitutional". He was ineligible because he “wasn’t a member of the Quebec bar, wasn’t a Quebec judge and didn’t qualify.” In this context ineligible and unqualified are synonymous.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09671302308442378445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3658799842683274996.post-40742885881431517212014-10-20T12:02:24.807-07:002014-10-20T12:02:24.807-07:00Michael Harris made an error in his statement abou...Michael Harris made an error in his statement about the Supreme Courts rejection of Marc Nadon. A fairly minor error that was tangential to his main point, but an error none the less, so you are correct in that regard. The rest of your opinion piece is nothing but an ad hominem attack on Helena Guergis. Instead of responding to what she says you attack the messenger.<br /><br />I give your rhetorical opinion piece a D minus.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09671302308442378445noreply@blogger.com